🚶
The Everyday Philosopher's Guide
English
🚶
The Everyday Philosopher's Guide
English
  • 👋Start Here - What is the Everyday Philosopher's Guide?
  • What is Philosophy?
  • Putting Philosophy Into Practice
  • ⚙️Tools
    • 🤔Critical Reasoning
      • Argumentation
      • Deduction
      • Induction
      • Validity
      • Soundness
      • Refutation
      • Definition
      • Tautology
      • Abduction
      • Certainty
      • Axiom
      • Fallacy
      • Dialectics
      • Paradox
      • Contradiction
      • Analogy
      • Anomaly
      • Reduction
      • Thought Experiment
      • Conditional
      • Ambiguity
      • Counterexample
      • Criteria
      • Doxa
    • ☯️Conceptual Distinctions
      • Absolute/Relative
      • a priori/a posteriori
      • Analytic/Synthetic
      • de re/de dicto
      • Defeasible/Indefeasible
      • Cause/Reason
      • Tetralemma (catuṣkoṭi)
      • Categorical/Modal
      • Sense/Reference
      • Conditional/Biconditional
      • Entailment/Implication
      • Endurantism/Perdurantism
      • Essential/Accidental
      • Knowledge by acquaintance/Knowledge by description
      • Internalism/Externalism
      • Belief/Knowledge
      • Necessary/Contingent
      • Necessary/Sufficient
      • Being/Nothingness
      • Objective/Subjective
      • Syntax/Semantics
      • Type/Token
    • ⚗️Thought Experiments
      • Ship of Theseus
      • The Chinese Room
      • Butterfly Dream
      • Thompson's Violinist
    • 💫Fallacies
      • Confirmation bias
      • Circularity
      • Fundamental attribution error
    • ⚖️Philosophical Frameworks
      • Principle of Charity
      • Golden Rule
  • 📜Lore
    • 🧑‍🏫Philosophers
      • Ancient
        • Aristotle
        • Confucius
        • Xunzi
        • Mencius
        • Zhuangzi
        • Thiruvalluvar
      • Medieval
      • Modern
      • Contemporary
        • Byung Chul Han
    • 📚Traditions
      • Baha'i Faith
      • Buddhism
      • Judaism
      • Islam
      • Posthumanism
    • 🗺️Geographical Regions
  • 🛠️Applications
    • From Person to Society
    • 🧍Personal Applications
      • Self-reflection
      • Philosophical Health
      • Journaling
      • Skills Development
        • Inner Development Goals
        • Metacognition
        • Integrity and Authenticity
        • Presence
        • Sensemaking
        • Open-mindedness
        • Communication
    • 🫂Relational Applications
      • Dialectical Behavioural Therapy
      • Interfaith dialogue
      • Existential Coaching
      • Philosophical Counselling
      • Philosophical Enquiry (PhiE)
      • Reason-based decision making
    • 🌏Societal Applications
      • Education
      • Healthcare
      • Public Policy
      • Gender
      • Religion
  • About
    • 📜Manifesto of the Everyday Philosopher
    • Our Contributors
      • Malaysian Philosophy Society
  • Appendix
    • License
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • What is a fallacy?
  • How fallacies appear in everyday life
  • Key considerations

Was this helpful?

Export as PDF
  1. Tools
  2. Critical Reasoning

Fallacy

What is a fallacy?

A fallacy is a mistake or error in reasoning that makes an argument weak or invalid. Fallacies often seem convincing on the surface, but they are based on flawed logic or misinformation. They can be intentional, used to manipulate people's opinions or beliefs, or unintentional, resulting from a misunderstanding or lack of knowledge.

How fallacies appear in everyday life

Here's are some ways fallacies can affect us:

Decision-making

If we base our decisions on fallacious arguments or reasoning, we may end up making poor choices that don't have the desired outcomes.

Misinformation

Fallacies can lead to the spread of misinformation, as people might share or accept false or misleading information based on flawed reasoning. And people acting on such information can lead to unintended consequences or even harm.

Communication

Fallacies can hinder effective communication, as they make it difficult to understand each other's points of view or engage in constructive discussions. Consider a conversation about climate change. Person A asserts, "Climate change is a serious issue that requires immediate action." Person B replies, "Well, you drive a car that uses gas, so your argument isn't valid."

In this example, Person B is committing the ad hominem fallacy by attacking Person A's character or action, instead of addressing the actual argument about climate change. This fallacy hinders effective communication because it shifts the discussion away from the central issue, making it difficult for the participants to understand each other's points of view on climate change and have a constructive discussion on potential solutions.

Key considerations

These are some ways we can minimize the impact of fallacies in our lives:

  • Identify and recognise common fallacies.

  • Analyze and evaluate the reasoning behind arguments and opinions.

PreviousAxiomNextDialectics

Last updated 3 months ago

Was this helpful?

Practise the .

To explore common fallacies encountered in everyday life, check out .

⚙️
🤔
principle of charity
Fallacies