🚶
The Everyday Philosopher's Guide
Simplified Chinese
🚶
The Everyday Philosopher's Guide
Simplified Chinese
  • 👋从这里开始 - 关于日常哲人指南
  • 什么是哲学?
  • 哲学的实践运用
  • ⚙️工具
    • 🤔批判性推理
      • Argumentation
      • Deduction
      • Induction
      • Validity
      • Soundness
      • Refutation
      • Definition
      • Tautology
      • Abduction
      • Certainty
      • Axiom
      • Fallacy
      • Dialectics
      • Analogy
      • Anomaly
      • Reduction
      • Thought Experiment
      • Conditional
      • Ambiguity
      • Counterexample
      • Criteria
      • Doxa
    • ☯️概念区分
      • Absolute/Relative
      • a priori/a posteriori
      • Analytic/Synthetic
      • de re/de dicto
      • Defeasible/Indefeasible
      • Cause/Reason
      • Categorical/Modal
      • Sense/Reference
      • Conditional/Biconditional
      • Entailment/Implication
      • Endurantism/Perdurantism
      • Essential/Accidental
      • Knowledge by acquaintance/Knowledge by description
      • Internalism/Externalism
      • Belief/Knowledge
      • Necessary/Contingent
      • Necessary/Sufficient
      • Being/Nothingness
      • Objective/Subjective
      • Syntax/Semantics
      • Type/Token
    • ⚗️思想实验
      • Ship of Theseus
      • The Chinese Room
      • Butterfly Dream
      • Thompson's Violinist
    • 💫谬误
      • Confirmation bias
      • Circularity
      • Fundamental attribution error
    • ⚖️哲学框架
      • Principle of Charity
      • Golden Rule
  • 📜知识体系
    • 🧑‍🏫哲学家
      • Ancient
        • Aristotle
        • Confucius
        • Xunzi
        • Mencius
        • Zhuangzi
        • Thiruvalluvar
      • Medieval
      • Modern
      • Contemporary
        • Byung Chul Han
    • 📚传统流派
      • Baha'i Faith
      • Buddhism
      • Judaism
      • Islam
      • Posthumanism
    • 🗺️地理区域
  • 🛠️应用
    • 从个人到社会
    • 🧍个人应用
      • Self-reflection
      • Philosophical Health
      • Journaling
      • Skills Development
        • Inner Development Goals
        • Metacognition
        • Integrity and Authenticity
        • Presence
        • Sensemaking
        • Open-mindedness
        • Communication
    • 🫂关系应用
      • Dialectical Behavioural Therapy
      • Interfaith dialogue
      • Existential Coaching
      • Philosophical Counselling
      • Philosophical Enquiry (PhiE)
      • Reason-based decision making
    • 🌏社会应用
      • Education
      • Healthcare
      • Public Policy
      • Gender
      • Religion
  • 关于我们
    • 📜日常哲人宣言
    • 我们的贡献者
      • 马来西亚哲学学会 (MyPhilSoc)
  • 附录
    • 版权说明
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • What is circularity?
  • How circularity affects us in everyday life
  • Key considerations and takeaways

Was this helpful?

Export as PDF
  1. 工具
  2. 谬误

Circularity

What is circularity?

Circularity, also known as circular reasoning or begging the question, is a logical fallacy that occurs when an argument relies on its own conclusion as one of its premises. In other words, it happens when the reasoning used to support a claim merely restates the claim instead of providing independent evidence or arguments.

Circularity is considered a flawed form of reasoning because it doesn't offer any new information or justification for the claim being made.

For example, a circular argument might be: "This medicine is effective because it works." The claim that the medicine is effective is supported by the premise that it works, which is just a restatement of the claim. A better argument would provide independent evidence, such as clinical trial results or expert testimonials, to support the claim that the medicine is effective.

How circularity affects us in everyday life

Here's are some ways circularity affects us in everyday life:

Communication

Circular reasoning can lead to unproductive discussions or debates, as it doesn't provide any new information or evidence to support a claim. This can make it difficult to reach a consensus or find common ground on contentious issues.

Decision-making

Relying on circular arguments can result in poor decision-making, as it may lead us to accept claims without sufficient evidence or justification. This can result in biased or ill-informed choices.

Critical thinking

Encountering circular reasoning in our own thoughts or the arguments of others can help us develop our critical thinking skills by forcing us to recognise and question the underlying assumptions and logic of our beliefs.

Key considerations and takeaways

To deal with circularity effectively in everyday life, it's important to:

  • Be aware of the potential for circular reasoning in our own thoughts and arguments, as well as those of others.

  • Develop the ability to identify and challenge circular arguments by looking for independent evidence or reasons to support a claim.

  • Foster open-mindedness and a willingness to consider alternative perspectives or explanations, even if they contradict our initial beliefs or assumptions.

When an argument relies on its own conclusion as one of its premises, this results in flawed reasoning which can negatively impact communication, decision-making, and critical thinking in everyday life. By being aware of the potential for circularity and developing the ability to identify and challenge circular arguments, we can improve our reasoning skills and make better-informed decisions.

PreviousConfirmation biasNextFundamental attribution error

Was this helpful?

⚙️
💫